Strategies
Every strategy in the study, best first. Narrow it to a family, a market, a timeframe or one of the five scores and the ranking is worked out again for exactly that — so the order you are reading always answers the question you set.
The Scores In Detail
The same scores, cut four ways: who leads on each measure, every strategy in order, the averages by family, clock and market, and the strategy that won each market on each clock. Pick one on the strip — the four figures beside it describe the whole field whichever is showing.
- 49
- Strategies
- 64
- Best
- 41
- Median
- 12
- Worst
Beats Hold
- WMA 20 50 Crossover 62
- MACD Zero Cross 52
- Faber Timing Model 51
- WMA 20 50 200 Early Stack 51
- Golden Cross 50 200 51
- WMA 20 200 Crossover 50
- WMA 20 50 200 Stack 48
- Ichimoku Cloud Breakout 47
Risk Adjusted
- WMA 20 50 Crossover 63
- WMA 20 50 200 Early Stack 61
- WMA 20 50 200 Stack 60
- Golden Cross 50 200 59
- WMA 20 200 Crossover 59
- Faber Timing Model 58
- MACD Zero Cross 58
- WMA 13 21 34 Stack 58
Profitability
- WMA 20 50 Crossover 82
- MACD Zero Cross 76
- WMA 20 50 200 Early Stack 75
- Ichimoku Cloud Breakout 75
- WMA 20 50 200 Stack 75
- WMA 20 200 Crossover 74
- Golden Cross 50 200 74
- Faber Timing Model 72
Win Rate
- Williams R 99
- Connors RSI 2 99
- Double 7 99
- Stochastic Oscillator 99
- RSI Oversold Overbought 99
- Support Resistance Bounce 98
- Bollinger Mean Reversion 97
- Mfi Reversal 96
Fee Efficiency
- High Watermark Momentum 97
- Golden Cross 50 200 91
- WMA 20 50 Adx Filtered 91
- Bollinger Squeeze Breakout 90
- RSI Oversold Overbought 90
- Faber Timing Model 89
- Mfi Reversal 87
- WMA 20 200 Crossover 84
Composite
- WMA 20 50 Crossover 65
- Golden Cross 50 200 61
- WMA 20 50 200 Early Stack 61
- WMA 20 50 200 Stack 60
- Faber Timing Model 59
- WMA 20 200 Crossover 59
- MACD Zero Cross 57
- Turtle Breakout 55 20 56
By Category
- Trend n=25 45
- Breakout n=5 45
- Momentum n=10 39
- Mean reversion n=9 28
By Timeframe
- 1d n=686 49
- 4h n=686 49
- 1h n=686 36
- 30m n=686 30
By Market
- SOLUSDT n=392 48
- DOGEUSDT n=392 44
- ALL n=392 43
- BNBUSDT n=392 41
- XRPUSDT n=392 40
- ETHUSDT n=392 40
- BTCUSDT n=392 32
Best strategy per symbol and timeframe
How Scoring Works
Every strategy is run on every symbol × timeframe cell, on both real and resampled price history. Each cell gets five 0–100 sub-scores, blended into one composite score by the weights below. A strategy's total score (shown next to its name) is the average of its composite score across all cells, then averaged again across the real and resampled datasets.
-
Beats Hold
25%
of the composite
Shows whether the strategy was worth running at all. A strategy that cannot beat owning the asset over the same window is an expensive way to own the asset.
- Sbeats_hold = clamp0100(50 + 25 log2EnetEhold)
-
Compares final net equity to what simply holding the asset would have returned over the same window. 50 is break-even; every doubling versus buy-and-hold adds 25 points.
-
Risk Adjusted
35%
of the composite
Shows what the return cost in volatility, which is what separates a steady strategy from a lucky one. It carries the most weight of the five.
- Srisk = clamp0100(55 · Sharpe + 5)
-
A linear read on the rolling annualized Sharpe ratio at the last trade — 0 Sharpe scores 5, roughly 1.7 Sharpe maxes out the scale.
-
Profitability
20%
of the composite
Shows how far the account actually grew, with no question of how it got there — the plain result a reader came for.
- Sprofit = clamp0100(20 log2EnetE0)
-
How many times the starting cash multiplied, on a log scale — each doubling of capital is worth 20 points.
-
Win Rate
10%
of the composite
Shows how often the strategy was right. On its own it says little, since one large loss outweighs many small wins, which is why it is worth a tenth.
- Swin = clamp0100(2.5 (W% − 20))
-
The share of trades that closed profitable, rescaled so a 20% win rate scores 0 and a 60% win rate maxes out the scale.
-
Fee Efficiency
10%
of the composite
Shows how much of the result survives the exchange. This is where a strategy that changes its mind often loses what it made.
- Sfee = clamp0100(Enet/Egross − 0.40.6 × 100)
-
The share of the fee-free (gross) result that survives after fees — 60% survival scores 0, keeping the full gross result scores 100.
-
Composite
Shows the number every ranking on this site is sorted by, and the one shown beside a strategy's name.
- Composite = 0.25 Sbeats_hold + 0.35 Srisk + 0.20 Sprofit + 0.10 Swin + 0.10 Sfee
-
The five sub-scores blended by weight into one 0–100 number per symbol × timeframe cell — risk-adjusted return and beating a hold carry the most weight.
The Markets
Every score above is earned on the same markets. Asset Characteristics measures those markets themselves rather than the strategies run on them: what each one returned, how roughly and how evenly it moved, how much of its life it spent going nowhere, and how closely it tracks the rest.